UT Rio Grande Valley Vaqueros 2026: the season story
UT Rio Grande Valley is 5-5 and rated No. 190 of 266 in the Cheap Seats Index, from this season's games only: Power 191st, Résumé 195th, schedule 229th toughest. Next: home against Stephen F. Austin.
Scouting report
Why it matters. A team can rank high by playing well, by beating good teams, or both; the two halves of the index show which. UT Rio Grande Valley is No. 190 of 266 in the Team Index and 5th of 10 in the Southland. Power, how well it plays, ranks 191st of 266; Résumé, what it has beaten, ranks 195th of 266.
The season, game by game
Why it matters. A record says who won; a rating for every game shows how convincingly, and whether a team is steady or streaky. UT Rio Grande Valley wins its games by 3.0 points on average, 43rd of 128 in margin among FCS teams. It has not played a team in our top 25 yet.
How they win
Why it matters. Knowing which side of the ball does the work tells you how a team is likely to win, and how it could lose. Its offense rates 60th of 128 in FCS (6th in the Southland) and its defense 42nd of 128 (5th in the conference).
Drive by drive
Why it matters. Points per drive is the cleanest single measure of an offense or a defense, because it ignores how fast or slow a team plays. UT Rio Grande Valley scores 2.35 points per drive (the FCS average is 2.16), 47th of 128. Its defense allows 1.89, 32nd of 128.
Under the hood
Why it matters. Play-by-play measures show whether a team is good on most snaps or living on a few big plays, which tends to matter for what comes next. Adjusted for its opponents, the offense adds -0.02 expected points per play (58th of 128) and stays on schedule on 41% of snaps (45th of 128). The defense allows +0.07 per play, 36th of 128.
When it matters
Why it matters. Third downs and red-zone trips are where drives are won or lost; small edges here turn into touchdowns instead of field goals. UT Rio Grande Valley converts 41% of its third downs and scores touchdowns on 51% of red-zone trips (FCS average 60%), 106th of 128.
Special teams
Why it matters. A missed field goal or a long return can flip a close game; these numbers show which units help and which hurt. Its special teams as a whole rank 63rd of 128, worth -0.10 points a game against an average unit. The best unit is kick returns, 31st of 128.
Tendencies
Why it matters. Tendencies are what opponents game-plan against: a team that is predictable on early downs makes the defense's job easier. UT Rio Grande Valley throws on 52% of early downs; the FCS average is 45%.
How they play
Why it matters. Fast teams pile up yards and slow teams shorten games; the line decides how much of either actually works. It runs 66.7 plays a game (FCS average 64.4). Its quarterbacks are sacked on 3.8% of dropbacks, 31st of 128, and 18% of its runs are stopped at or behind the line, 51st of 128.
Who they have played
Why it matters. A great offense against weak defenses is not the same thing as a great offense; the splits show the difference. UT Rio Grande Valley's schedule ranks 229th of 266 in strength, 9th toughest of 10 in the Southland.
Record versus reality
Why it matters. Records built on close wins and lucky bounces tend to drift back toward how well a team really plays. UT Rio Grande Valley has 5 wins against 5.2 expected from its play and schedule, and is 1-2 in one-score games.
Rise and fall
Why it matters. Teams change over a season through injuries, new starters and growth; the trend shows which way this one is moving. UT Rio Grande Valley was 169th in Power after week 2 and is 191st now; its best was 169th after week 2.
What is ahead
Why it matters. Playing out the rest of the season 10,000 times turns a schedule into odds: the most likely record, and how likely each goal is. Across 10,000 simulated seasons UT Rio Grande Valley averages 5.6 wins and almost never wins the Southland.
Top players and teams like them
Why it matters. Comparing a team with its closest statistical matches puts its season in context beyond the standings. The highest-ranked player on the roster is TJ Neal, 127th of 1841 defensive backs. The closest match in style and strength is Rhode Island.
